I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM. I haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm seeing are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against 4.10.0.20130801?
[WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 is missing, no dependency information available Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED /com/adobe/flex/compiler/mxmlc/4.6.0.23201/mxmlc-4.6.0.23201.pom [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:mxmlc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is missing, no dependency information available Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED /com/adobe/flex/compiler/digest/4.6.0.23201/digest-4.6.0.23201.pom [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:digest:jar:4.6.0.23201 is missing, no dependency information available Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED /com/adobe/flex/compiler/optimizer/4.6.0.23201/optimizer-4.6.0.23201.pom [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:optimizer:jar:4.6.0.23201 is missing, no dependency information available Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED /com/adobe/flex/compiler/asdoc/4.6.0.23201/asdoc-4.6.0.23201.pom [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:asdoc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is missing, no dependency information available Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.CENSORED/com/adobe/flex/compiler/swcdepends/4.6.0.23201/swcdepends-4.6.0.23201.pom [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:swcdepends:jar:4.6.0.23201 is missing, no dependency information available I can post poms if it helps. On a the issue of the RSLs, I have them working and I will post what I have online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help them if needed. Michael From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [via Apache Flex Development] [mailto:ml-node+s2333347n29598...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM To: Scharp, Michael Subject: AW: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry() I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-) Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think that would be a good idea. If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be possible as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if you are talking about modules in the same maven build, I would stronly suggest not to try that. Chris ________________________________________ Von: Avi Kessner [[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=0>] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:24 An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=1> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry() If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect that to cause conflicts? On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=2>" <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=3>> wrote: > Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you > throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of Apache > Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains, if > you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency. > Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like. > > The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As the Flex > RSLs for an application were only loaded once no matter what URL you > visited and it usually even survived a Cache cleanup. As soon as a SWZ was > loaded, the Flashplayer sort of installed it locally and as soon as an > application needed it again, it simply loaded it without having to download > it again. > > The reason for you having to explicitly list every dependency that Needs a > non-Default scope, is mavens inability to overload scopes. So the framworks > master pom has normal dependencies to it's libs and if you simply reference > that, you wouldn't utilize the shared-lib concept of RSLs but use normal > SWCs for compilation, resulting in a way bigger Output file. So if you want > to migrate your Project to Apache Flex you have to replace every Caching > scope with "rsl". > > Chris > > > ________________________________________ > Von: mscharp [[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=4>] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:03 > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=5> > Betreff: RE: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and > getAdvancedTelemetry() > > Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't > say enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project. > > So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of > the FDK you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone > tried using FM 6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK? My only question with it having to > do with the getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the FM > source code. > > As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't signed, > and that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple flex > applications from the same domain... which we are. So, previously in our > pom files we had: > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>textLayout</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>charts</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>rpc</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > <artifactId>mx</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>spark</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>caching</scope> > </dependency> > > Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new poms. > I've been following what I've been able to find on the web as far as > standard practices for what needs to be included in the pom files, but a > lot of them look a bit different than what we currently have in our poms. > So, I'm not sure if I still need those dependencies listed or not. If I > do, would the scope be "rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more like > this? > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>rsl</scope> > </dependency> > > Again, thanks everyone for the help. > > Michael > > From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=6> [via > Apache Flex Development] [mailto: > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=7>] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM > To: Scharp, Michael > Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and > getAdvancedTelemetry() > > Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl" > and "caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different files > from maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed rsls > have dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz > files, which it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing the > testsuite to fail. > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45 > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1> > Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and > getAdvancedTelemetry() > > Hi, > > > This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files). > Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they are > just not signed. > > Thanks, > Justin > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html > To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and > getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here< > >. > NAML< > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29598.html To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwyOTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==>. NAML<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29601.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
