Thanks Avi, here is what I have defined for the dependencies in my build tag,
are there more/different dependencies I need to set?
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>${flex.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>compiler</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>pom</type>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Thanks
From: Avi Kessner [via Apache Flex Development]
[mailto:ml-node+s2333347n29608...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:32 AM
To: Scharp, Michael
Subject: RE: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
getAdvancedTelemetry()
You need to overide /set the dependencies in the plugin inside the build
tags
On 13 Sep 2013 08:35, "mscharp" <[hidden
email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=0>> wrote:
> I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM.
> I haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm
> seeing are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against
> 4.10.0.20130801?
>
> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 is missing,
> no dependency information available
> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/mxmlc/4.6.0.23201/mxmlc-4.6.0.23201.pom
> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:mxmlc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
> missing, no dependency information available
> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/digest/4.6.0.23201/digest-4.6.0.23201.pom
> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:digest:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
> missing, no dependency information available
> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/optimizer/4.6.0.23201/optimizer-4.6.0.23201.pom
> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:optimizer:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
> missing, no dependency information available
> Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/asdoc/4.6.0.23201/asdoc-4.6.0.23201.pom
> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:asdoc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
> missing, no dependency information available
> Downloading:
> https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.CENSORED/com/adobe/flex/compiler/swcdepends/4.6.0.23201/swcdepends-4.6.0.23201.pom
> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:swcdepends:jar:4.6.0.23201
> is missing, no dependency information available
>
> I can post poms if it helps.
>
> On a the issue of the RSLs, I have them working and I will post what I
> have online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help them
> if needed.
>
> Michael
>
> From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=1> [via
> Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=2>]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM
> To: Scharp, Michael
> Subject: AW: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>
> I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-)
>
> Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think
> that would be a good idea.
> If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be
> possible as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if you are
> talking about modules in the same maven build, I would stronly suggest not
> to try that.
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Avi Kessner [[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=0>]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:24
> An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=1>
> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>
> If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect
> that to cause conflicts?
> On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=2>" <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=3>>
> wrote:
>
> > Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you
> > throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of
> Apache
> > Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains,
> if
> > you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency.
> > Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like.
> >
> > The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As the Flex
> > RSLs for an application were only loaded once no matter what URL you
> > visited and it usually even survived a Cache cleanup. As soon as a SWZ
> was
> > loaded, the Flashplayer sort of installed it locally and as soon as an
> > application needed it again, it simply loaded it without having to
> download
> > it again.
> >
> > The reason for you having to explicitly list every dependency that Needs
> a
> > non-Default scope, is mavens inability to overload scopes. So the
> framworks
> > master pom has normal dependencies to it's libs and if you simply
> reference
> > that, you wouldn't utilize the shared-lib concept of RSLs but use normal
> > SWCs for compilation, resulting in a way bigger Output file. So if you
> want
> > to migrate your Project to Apache Flex you have to replace every Caching
> > scope with "rsl".
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Von: mscharp [[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=4>]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:03
> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=5>
> > Betreff: RE: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> > getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >
> > Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't
> > say enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project.
> >
> > So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of
> > the FDK you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone
> > tried using FM 6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK? My only question with it having
> to
> > do with the getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the FM
> > source code.
> >
> > As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't signed,
> > and that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple flex
> > applications from the same domain... which we are. So, previously in our
> > pom files we had:
> >
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>framework</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>textLayout</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>charts</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>rpc</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> <artifactId>mx</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>spark</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>caching</scope>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new poms.
> > I've been following what I've been able to find on the web as far as
> > standard practices for what needs to be included in the pom files, but a
> > lot of them look a bit different than what we currently have in our poms.
> > So, I'm not sure if I still need those dependencies listed or not. If I
> > do, would the scope be "rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more like
> > this?
> >
> > <dependency>
> >
> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >
> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
> >
> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> > <type>swc</type>
> > <scope>rsl</scope>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Again, thanks everyone for the help.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=6> [via
> Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=7>]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM
> > To: Scharp, Michael
> > Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> > getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >
> > Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl"
> > and "caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different
> files
> > from maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed
> rsls
> > have dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz
> > files, which it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing the
> > testsuite to fail.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45
> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1>
> > Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> > getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files).
> > Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they are
> > just not signed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> > ________________________________
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> > below:
> >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html
> > To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> > getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<
> > >.
> > NAML<
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29598.html
> To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<
> >.
> NAML<
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29601.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29608.html
To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
getAdvancedTelemetry(), click
here<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwyOTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==>.
NAML<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29611.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
