I would try doing a text comparison between your pom and the one posted here, and see if it catches anything. I'd do it for you, but outside my git commitsI don't have a good text comparison tool.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/18713810/787202 brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47 On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, mscharp <michael.sch...@fmr.com> wrote: > Thanks Avi, here is what I have defined for the dependencies in my build tag, > are there more/different dependencies I need to set? > > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>${flex.groupId}</groupId> > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>pom</type> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > > Thanks > > From: Avi Kessner [via Apache Flex Development] > [mailto:ml-node+s2333347n29608...@n4.nabble.com] > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:32 AM > To: Scharp, Michael > Subject: RE: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and > getAdvancedTelemetry() > > You need to overide /set the dependencies in the plugin inside the build > tags > On 13 Sep 2013 08:35, "mscharp" <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=0>> wrote: > >> I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM. >> I haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm >> seeing are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against >> 4.10.0.20130801? >> >> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 is missing, >> no dependency information available >> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/mxmlc/4.6.0.23201/mxmlc-4.6.0.23201.pom >> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:mxmlc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >> missing, no dependency information available >> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/digest/4.6.0.23201/digest-4.6.0.23201.pom >> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:digest:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >> missing, no dependency information available >> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/optimizer/4.6.0.23201/optimizer-4.6.0.23201.pom >> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:optimizer:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >> missing, no dependency information available >> Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/asdoc/4.6.0.23201/asdoc-4.6.0.23201.pom >> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:asdoc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >> missing, no dependency information available >> Downloading: >> https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.CENSORED/com/adobe/flex/compiler/swcdepends/4.6.0.23201/swcdepends-4.6.0.23201.pom >> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:swcdepends:jar:4.6.0.23201 >> is missing, no dependency information available >> >> I can post poms if it helps. >> >> On a the issue of the RSLs, I have them working and I will post what I >> have online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help them >> if needed. >> >> Michael >> >> From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=1> [via >> Apache Flex Development] [mailto: >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=2>] >> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM >> To: Scharp, Michael >> Subject: AW: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> getAdvancedTelemetry() >> >> I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-) >> >> Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think >> that would be a good idea. >> If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be >> possible as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if you are >> talking about modules in the same maven build, I would stronly suggest not >> to try that. >> >> Chris >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: Avi Kessner [[hidden >> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=0>] >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:24 >> An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=1> >> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> getAdvancedTelemetry() >> >> If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect >> that to cause conflicts? >> On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "[hidden >> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=2>" <[hidden >> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=3>> >> wrote: >> >> > Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you >> > throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of >> Apache >> > Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains, >> if >> > you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency. >> > Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like. >> > >> > The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As the Flex >> > RSLs for an application were only loaded once no matter what URL you >> > visited and it usually even survived a Cache cleanup. As soon as a SWZ >> was >> > loaded, the Flashplayer sort of installed it locally and as soon as an >> > application needed it again, it simply loaded it without having to >> download >> > it again. >> > >> > The reason for you having to explicitly list every dependency that Needs >> a >> > non-Default scope, is mavens inability to overload scopes. So the >> framworks >> > master pom has normal dependencies to it's libs and if you simply >> reference >> > that, you wouldn't utilize the shared-lib concept of RSLs but use normal >> > SWCs for compilation, resulting in a way bigger Output file. So if you >> want >> > to migrate your Project to Apache Flex you have to replace every Caching >> > scope with "rsl". >> > >> > Chris >> > >> > >> > ________________________________________ >> > Von: mscharp [[hidden >> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=4>] >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:03 >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=5> >> > Betreff: RE: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> > getAdvancedTelemetry() >> > >> > Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't >> > say enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project. >> > >> > So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of >> > the FDK you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone >> > tried using FM 6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK? My only question with it having >> to >> > do with the getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the FM >> > source code. >> > >> > As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't signed, >> > and that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple flex >> > applications from the same domain... which we are. So, previously in our >> > pom files we had: >> > >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>textLayout</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>charts</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>rpc</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> <artifactId>mx</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>spark</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>caching</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > >> > Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new poms. >> > I've been following what I've been able to find on the web as far as >> > standard practices for what needs to be included in the pom files, but a >> > lot of them look a bit different than what we currently have in our poms. >> > So, I'm not sure if I still need those dependencies listed or not. If I >> > do, would the scope be "rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more like >> > this? >> > >> > <dependency> >> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > >> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId> >> > >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>rsl</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > >> > Again, thanks everyone for the help. >> > >> > Michael >> > >> > From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=6> [via >> Apache Flex Development] [mailto: >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=7>] >> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM >> > To: Scharp, Michael >> > Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> > getAdvancedTelemetry() >> > >> > Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl" >> > and "caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different >> files >> > from maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed >> rsls >> > have dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz >> > files, which it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing the >> > testsuite to fail. >> > >> > Chris >> > >> > ________________________________________ >> > Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden >> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>] >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45 >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1> >> > Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> > getAdvancedTelemetry() >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > > This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files). >> > Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they are >> > just not signed. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Justin >> > ________________________________ >> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> > below: >> > >> > >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html >> > To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> > getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here< >> > >. >> > NAML< >> > >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> > >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html >> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> ________________________________ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> below: >> >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29598.html >> To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here< >> >. >> NAML< >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml >> > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29601.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29608.html > To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and > getAdvancedTelemetry(), click > here<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwyOTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==>. > NAML<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29611.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
