On 04/19/2018 03:57 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 19-Apr-18 3:48 PM, Arnon Warshavsky wrote: >> Copy on the commit message and volatile. >> >> Regarding the new function defunct_and_remain_in_endless_loop () >> I don't think I can put that in a separate patch without breaking the >> current patch independence. > > How so? > > Just leave some panic instances in there for thread-related stuff and > fix them up in the next patch. > > Also, i'm not sure sending threads into an infinite loop on panic is > such a good idea. You might want to look at Olivier's approach [1] to > creating threads, using pthread_barriers and pthread_kill/cancel. >
I haven't reviewed this one yet, but going into an infinite loop doesn't seem like the right thing to do. > This does warrant a separate patch now :) >
