On Thursday 20 July 2017 11:23 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:34:39AM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 02:36 PM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
Remove the unwanted spaces before `;' across DPDK source code
by below one-liner with some minor manual refinements.
find . -name '*.[ch]' | xargs sed -i 's/\([^;(]\) \+;/\1;/g'
The fixes for cmdline library are skipped, because it has a
different coding style. It deserves a separate cleanup if
necessary. The fixes for drivers' base code are also skipped
to keep the base code intact.
Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei....@intel.com>
---
[...]
/* compute the number of steps to the right */
diff --git a/lib/librte_sched/rte_bitmap.h b/lib/librte_sched/rte_bitmap.h
index 010d752..e487b58 100644
--- a/lib/librte_sched/rte_bitmap.h
+++ b/lib/librte_sched/rte_bitmap.h
@@ -500,7 +500,8 @@ __rte_bitmap_scan_read(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t
*pos, uint64_t *slab)
uint64_t *slab2;
slab2 = bmp->array2 + bmp->index2;
- for ( ; bmp->go2 ; bmp->index2 ++, slab2 ++, bmp->go2 = bmp->index2 &
RTE_BITMAP_CL_SLAB_MASK) {
+ for ( ; bmp->go2; bmp->index2++, slab2++,
+ bmp->go2 = bmp->index2 & RTE_BITMAP_CL_SLAB_MASK) {
^^^^
Trivial: space before ';' in 'for' here should also be removed.
Thank you for your feedbacks! :-)
Hmm.. Actually the space between `(' and `;' was kept intentionally
when I wrote this 's/\([^;(]\) \+;/\1;/g' sed script. There are many
other such cases. It's acceptable to me, and I thought we like it:
Ok.
diff --git i/app/test-eventdev/parser.h w/app/test-eventdev/parser.h
index 75a5a3b..372b85f 100644
--- i/app/test-eventdev/parser.h
+++ w/app/test-eventdev/parser.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
#define skip_white_spaces(pos) \
({ \
__typeof__(pos) _p = (pos); \
- for ( ; isspace(*_p); _p++) \
+ for (; isspace(*_p); _p++) \
; \
_p; \
[...]
That is a long list of change :).
IMO, we should remove the space (in which case I agree with your change)
- but, this is a more of a acceptable-coding-standards issue and I am
not sure what the agreed standard for DPDK is in this case. Maybe Thomas
can comment.
-
Shreyansh