Hi John, Konstantin, On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Ravi Kerur <rke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi John, > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> > From: Ravi Kerur [mailto:rke...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 11:21 PM >> > To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com> >> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; >> > Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com> >> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v4 0/3] Merge l3fwd-acl and l3fwd >> > >> > >> > Should I work with documentation team to update the document? If yes, >> > please let me know the contact information. >> >> Hi Ravi, >> >> There isn't any documentation team. Unfortunately. :-) >> >> The raw documentation is in text format and is generally updated by >> the developer submitting a patch. >> >> There is already docs for l3fwd and l3fwd_acl so all that is required >> is to merge them. However, you will need to take some care to remove >> the duplicate sections and to make sure that the merged doc makes >> sense as a whole. >> >> See the documentation guidelines: >> >> http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/documentation.html > > > Thanks. I realized after skimming through the documents and seeing a > 'doc:' prefix for review. Some clarifications on merging 'l3fwd' and > 'l3fwd-acl' > > 1. Instead of wholesale merger of both 'l3fwd' and 'l3fwd-acl', does it > make sense to > > a. Modify 'l3fwd' document by adding ACL processing information ('-A' > cmdline) and providing a link or reference to existing 'l3fwd-acl' > documentation since nothing has changed in terms of 'l3fwd-acl'. > > b. Add file read options for 'exact match' and 'longest prefix match' in > 'l3fwd' documentation. > Kindly let me know how you want me to proceed with the changes to documentation? Thanks. > > Thanks. > >> >> >> John >> > >
