John, Konstantin,

Kindly let me know new 'v5' patch follows dpdk guidelines?
I just followed what's in the dpdk contributing code guidelines.


   - git format-patch -3 -o patch/ -v 5 --cover-letter
   - git send-email --to dev@dpdk.org --in-reply-to <v4-MSGID> patch/*

Thanks.


On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Ravi Kerur <rke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Should I work with documentation team to update the document? If yes,
> please let me know the contact information.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Kerur
>> > Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2017 7:47 PM
>> > To: dev@dpdk.org
>> > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Richardson,
>> Bruce
>> > <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Ravi Kerur <rke...@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [v4 0/3] Merge l3fwd-acl and l3fwd
>> >
>> > This patchset merges l3fwd-acl and l3fwd code into common directory.
>> > Adds file read options to build LPM and EM tables.
>>
>> Hi Ravi,
>>
>> Thanks to this. It seems like a good change. There are probably too many
>> L2/L3 variants and some of them should be merged.
>>
>> Note, you will also have to merge the sample app guides in some sensible
>> way:
>>
>>     http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/l3_forward.html
>>     http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/l3_forward_access_ctrl.html
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to