On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:18:04PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > I'm not opposed to default values, but it seems to me that if we are splitting > out a configuration storage library from dpdk, part of the initzliation of > that > library can be installing default values. That is to say, instead of having > the > code specific areas assume a default value if none is present in the config, > an > init function for the configuration storage library would just populate the > keystore. That way all the dpdk itself has to do is a key lookup. > > Neil
I don't think this provides as much mental locality of reference for people reading the code. But, an unwanted default argument can be filled with 0 / NULL / false as needed. Matthew.
