On 10/10/2024 11:58 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
>
>
> config restore
>>>>
>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/10/2024 1:08 PM, Dariusz Sosnowski wrote:
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 01:17
>>>>>> To: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnow...@nvidia.com>; Konstantin Ananyev
>>>>>> <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
>>>>>> (EXTERNAL) <tho...@monjalon.net>; Andrew Rybchenko
>>>>>> <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] ethdev: rework config restore
>>>>>>
>>>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/9/2024 5:18 PM, Dariusz Sosnowski wrote:
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 03:08
>>>>>>>> To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>; Dariusz
>>>>>>>> Sosnowski <dsosnow...@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
>>>>>>>> (EXTERNAL) <tho...@monjalon.net>; Andrew Rybchenko
>>>>>>>> <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] ethdev: rework config restore
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/8/2024 6:21 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have been working on optimizing the latency of calls to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dev_start(), on ports spawned by mlx5 PMD. Most of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the work requires changes in the implementation of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .dev_start() PMD callback, but I also wanted to start a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion regarding configuration restore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dev_start() does a few things on top of calling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .dev_start()
>>>>>>>> callback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Before calling it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - eth_dev_mac_restore() - if device supports
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RTE_ETH_DEV_NOLIVE_MAC_ADDR;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - After calling it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - eth_dev_mac_restore() - if device does not support
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RTE_ETH_DEV_NOLIVE_MAC_ADDR;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - restore promiscuous config
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - restore all multicast config
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eth_dev_mac_restore() iterates over all known MAC addresses -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stored in rte_eth_dev_data.mac_addrs array - and calls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .mac_addr_set() and .mac_addr_add() callbacks to apply these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MAC
>>>>>>>> addresses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Promiscuous config restore checks if promiscuous mode is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled or not, and calls .promiscuous_enable() or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .promiscuous_disable()
>>>>>>>> callback.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All multicast config restore checks if all multicast mode is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled or not, and calls .allmulticast_enable() or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .allmulticast_disable()
>>>>>>>> callback.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Callbacks are called directly in all of these cases, to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bypass the checks for applying the same configuration, which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist in relevant
>>>>>>>> APIs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checks are bypassed to force drivers to reapply the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's consider what happens in the following sequence of API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. rte_eth_dev_configure()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. rte_eth_tx_queue_setup()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. rte_eth_rx_queue_setup()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Stores promiscuous state in dev->data->promiscuous 5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_allmulticast_enable()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Stores allmulticast state in dev->data->allmulticast 6.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dev_start()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->dev_start()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->mac_addr_set() - apply default MAC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> address
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even though all configuration is available in dev->data after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> step 5, library forces reapplying this configuration in step 6.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In mlx5 PMD case all relevant callbacks require communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the kernel driver, to configure the device (mlx5 PMD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must create/destroy new kernel flow rules and/or change netdev
>>>> config).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mlx5 PMD handles applying all configuration in .dev_start(),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so the following forced callbacks force additional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication with the kernel. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same configuration is applied multiple times.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As an optimization, mlx5 PMD could check if a given
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration was applied, but this would duplicate the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality of the library (for example
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_promiscuous_enable() does not call the driver if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dev->data->promiscuous is set).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: Since all of the configuration is available before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .dev_start() callback is called, why ethdev library does not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect .dev_start() to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> take this configuration into account?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, why library has to reapply the configuration?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could not find any particular reason why configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore exists as part of the process (it was in the initial DPDK
>>>> commit).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My assumption is .dev_stop() cause these values reset in some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .dev_start() restores them back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Bruce or @Konstantin may remember the history.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, as I remember, at least some Intel PMDs calling hw_reset()
>>>>>>>>>>> ad
>>>>>>>>>>> dec_stop() and even dev_start() to make sure that HW is in a
>>>>>>>>>>> clean
>>>>>>>>>>> (known)
>>>>>>>> state.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I agree this is device specific behavior, and can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> managed by what device requires.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Probably yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The patches included in this RFC, propose a mechanism which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would help with managing which drivers rely on forceful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>> restore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Drivers could advertise if forceful configuration restore is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed through `RTE_ETH_DEV_*_FORCE_RESTORE` device flag. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this flag is set, then the driver in question requires ethdev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to forcefully restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK to use flag for it, but not sure about using
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'dev_info->dev_flags'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (RTE_ETH_DEV_*) for this, as this flag is shared with user and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is all dpdk internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about to have a dedicated flag for it? We can have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dedicated set of flag values for restore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Agreed. What do you think about the following?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Instead of exposing that, can we probably make it transparent to
>>>>>>>>>>> the user and probably ethdev layer too?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 to make it transparent to user, but not sure if we can make it
>>>>>>>>>> transparent to ethdev layer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just to be clear:
>>>>>>>>> Let say, using example from above:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dev_start()
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->dev_start()
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->mac_addr_set() - apply default MAC address
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable()
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We probably can introduce ethdev internal function (still visible
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> PMDs) that would do last 3 steps:
>>>>>>>>> ethdev_replay_user_conf(...)
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->mac_addr_set() - apply default MAC address
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable()
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And let PMD itself to decide does it needs to call it at dev_start()
>>>>>>>>> or not.
>>>>>>>>> So it will become:
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dev_start()
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->dev_start()
>>>>>>>>> -Call ethdev_replay_user_conf(.)
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->mac_addr_set() - apply default MAC
>>>>>>>>> address
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>>>>>>>>> -Call dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable()
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For PMDs that do need to restore user provided config And
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dev_start()
>>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->dev_start()
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For those who do not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, got it what you mean.
>>>>>>>> Pushing restore functionality to PMDs works, but this may be doing
>>>>>>>> redundant work on each PMD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Instead Dariusz suggests PMD to provide a flag to ehtdev to what to
>>>>>>>> restore and common code in ethdev does the work.
>>>>>>>> My below dedicated data struct comment is to have this flag in a
>>>>>>>> new struct, overall like following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dev_start()
>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->dev_start()
>>>>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->get_restore_flags(ethdev, RTE_ETH_START,
>>>>>>>> &flags)
>>>>>>>> - if (flags & MAC) dev->dev_ops->mac_addr_set()
>>>>>>>> - if (flags & PROMISC) dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>>>>>>>> - ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you please explain what is the benefit of exposing flags
>>>>>>> through dev_ops
>>>>>> callback vs a dedicated flags field in rte_eth_dev_data?
>>>>>>> In both solutions:
>>>>>>> - config restore is transparent to the user,
>>>>>>> - drivers can omit config restore (either by not implementing the
>>>>>>> callback or not providing the flags),
>>>>>>> - an ABI change is introduced (not a huge concern, at least for 24.11).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that my initial proposal with "internal_flags" was too
>>>>>>> vague, but renaming and splitting this field into:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - dev_start_restore_flags
>>>>>>> - dev_reset_restore_flags
>>>>>>> - and so on...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> seems sufficient, at least in my opinion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dariusz,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Putting flags to rte_eth_dev_data works, and it is easier since there
>>>>>> is direct access from rte_eth_dev to rte_eth_dev_data, so you don't
>>>>>> need new dev_ops. So this is a valid option.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But benefit of new dev_ops is to keep "struct rte_eth_dev_data" clean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "struct rte_eth_dev_data" is integral data structure for ethdev and
>>>>>> it is used in multiple locations, mostly related to the datapath and
>>>>>> all drivers needs to deal with fields of this struct.
>>>>>> Like [rx]_queues, dev_private, dev_conf all important and used a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want to protect "struct rte_eth_dev_data" from noise as much as
>>>>>> possible, though what is noise is not always that clear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This restore flag is not critical, and I expect most of the drivers
>>>>>> won't care and populate this restore flag at all. That is why to me
>>>>>> it is better have dedicated struct for it and only drivers care about
>>>>>> restore
>>>> feature know it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see. Thank you very much for the explanation.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case, it looks like adding this to dev_ops is the way to go.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, summarizing it all:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. dev_ops should be extended with a callback with the following
>>>>> signature and
>>>> enums/flags:
>>>>>
>>>>> enum rte_eth_dev_operation op {
>>>>> RTE_ETH_START,
>>>>> RTE_ETH_STOP,
>>>>> RTE_ETH_RESET,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> #define RTE_ETH_RESTORE_MAC_ADDR RTE_BIT32(0) #define
>>>>> RTE_ETH_RESTORE_PROMISC RTE_BIT32(1) #define
>>>> RTE_ETH_RESTORE_ALLMULTI
>>>>> RTE_BIT32(2)
>>>>>
>>>>> void (*get_restore_flags)(
>>>>> struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>>>> enum rte_eth_dev_operation op,
>>>>> uint32_t *flags);
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. rte_eth_dev_start() will work as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->dev_start()
>>>>> - Call dev->dev_ops->get_restore_flags(dev, RTE_ETH_START, &flags). If
>>>>> callback
>>>> is not provided, assume flags == 0.
>>>>> - if (flags & RTE_ETH_RESTORE_MAC_ADDR) - restore MAC addresses
>>>>> - and so on...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All above looks good.
>>>>
>>>>> Also, I would like to add the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Patchset introducing this change should add get_restore_flags()
>>>> implementation to all drivers, which informs that all config should be
>>>> restored.
>>>>> This would preserve the current behavior.
>>>>> Later, this could be refined driver by driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What you are saying is correct, but I suspect most of the drivers don't
>>>> really need
>>>> this restore, but they have it since it was in the ethdev layer.
>>>>
>>>> If we introduce back restore via get_restore_flags(), it may stay as it is
>>>> in drivers, at
>>>> least for most of them.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think to risk breaking stuff for this case.
>>>>
>>>> So don't implement this in the drivers by default, so who needs it will
>>>> recognize
>>>> the issue and will implement it. If we merge this patch for -rc1, it gives
>>>> enough
>>>> time for drivers to detect the issue and fix it.
>>>
>>> It seems rather too risky, especially considering that for example, there
>>> are a few Intel drivers which do not have maintainers (like
>> i40e).
>>> So, I don't know what will happen to such drivers. They may be left broken
>>> (if they are affected) for 24.11 and future releases.
>>> But I agree that if default behavior is preserved, this dependence of
>>> drivers on config restore might stay as is.
>>> I'm on the fence about it.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, not sure.
>>
>> Do you think the dev_ops function can be implemented in the
>> 'ethdev_driver.c' and all drivers use exact same function?
>> So this reduces changes and duplication in drivers while preserving the
>> behavior.
>
> Wonder why it can't be done visa-versa?
> If this new function is not implemented by PMD, then simply assume
> that everything needs to be restored (as it happens now)?
>
True, this preserve the behavior and prevents updating all drivers.
I think can be done in two ways:
1. dev_ops() tells what NOT to restore, if dev_ops() not implemented or
it returns zero, restore everything. Here what not nice is what to
restore in this case is not very well defined.
2. dev_ops() tells what to restore, but when not implemented default
flag value is all restore. Which is current behavior.
I am for option 2. and I assume that is what Konstantin also suggest,
but I want to clarify to be sure.
>>>>
>>>> Only we may implement this to the drivers that exist when this restore
>>>> code was
>>>> introduced.
>>>> I mean whatever driver exist in the initial DPDK commit, implement this
>>>> logic only
>>>> to those drivers.
>>>
>>> Seems reasonable to me. In this case, it would be igb (IIUC, now it's named
>>> e1000) and ixgbe.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Also, there's an open question about 'stop' and 'reset' operations.
>>>>> At the moment, ethdev layer does not do any config manipulation during
>>>>> these
>>>> operations.
>>>>> Maybe we should limit get_restore_flags() to 'start' only?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ack, I was about to suggest the same, for now only have 'RTE_ETH_START'
>>>> as a placeholder for later possible usages.
>>>
>>> Ack
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So PMDs only will provide what to restore with an internal API and
>>>>>>>> common ethdev layer will restore it.
>>>>>>>> If no restore required PMD may not implement .get_restore_flags() at
>>>>>>>> all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Additionally, RTE_ETH_START, RTE_ETH_RESET etc flag can be provided
>>>>>>>> to internal API to get what to restore in different states...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Suggested 'internal_flag' in "struct rte_eth_dev_data" can be
>>>>>>>>>> confusing and open to interpretation what to use it for and by
>>>>>>>>>> time become source of defect.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, same thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Instead what do you think to have a separate, dedicated data struct
>>>>>>>>>> for it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm... not sure I understood you here...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Might be we can move this restoration code into the new ethdev
>>>>>>>>>>> helper function,(ethdevd_user_config_restore() or so) that PMD
>>>>>>>>>>> can invoke
>>>>>>>> during its dev_start() if needed?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> #define RTE_ETH_DEV_INTERNAL_PROMISC_FORCE_RESTORE
>>>>>> RTE_BIT32(0)
>>>>>>>>>>>> #define RTE_ETH_DEV_INTERNAL_ALLMULTI_FORCE_RESTORE
>>>>>> RTE_BIT32(1)
>>>>>>>>>>>> #define RTE_ETH_DEV_INTERNAL_MAC_ADDR_FORCE_RESTORE
>>>>>>>> RTE_BIT32(2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> struct rte_eth_dev_data {
>>>>>>>>>>>> /* snip */
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> uint32_t dev_flags;
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Internal device capabilities, used only by ethdev library.
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Certain functionalities provided by the library might
>>>>>> enabled/disabled,
>>>>>>>>>>>> * based on driver exposing certain capabilities.
>>>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>>>> uint32_t internal_flags;
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> /* snip */
>>>>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also perhaps we have go into details what needs to be restored
>>>>>>>>>>>>> after 'stop' and what needs to be restored after 'reset' and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use similar
>>>>>>>> mechanism etc...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should look into that.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any 'codification' of semantics between drivers and ethdev
>>>>>>>>>>>> library is good in
>>>>>>>> my opinion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> At least right now, ethdev does not change any configuration in
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'stop' and
>>>>>>>> 'reset' from what I see.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But that's on library side only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This way, if we would conclude that it makes sense for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .dev_start() to handle all starting configuration aspects, we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could track which drivers still rely
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on configuration restore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dariusz Sosnowski (4):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ethdev: rework config restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ethdev: omit promiscuous config restore if not required
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ethdev: omit all multicast config restore if not required
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ethdev: omit MAC address restore if not required
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 39
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.39.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
