-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:35 PM
To: Xu, HailinX <hailinx...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
<john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Xu, Qian Q
<qian.q...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Peng,
Yuan <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>;
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test
On 20/04/2023 11:32, Kevin Traynor wrote:
On 20/04/2023 03:40, Xu, HailinX wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Xu, HailinX <hailinx...@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:13 PM
To: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
<abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>;
Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
<benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen
<d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal
<hemant.agra...@nxp.com>;
Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
<jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>;
Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Luca Boccassi
<bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q
<qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>;
Thomas
Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; yangh...@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan
<yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM
To: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
<abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; Ali Alnubani
<alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.wal...@intel.com>;
David Christensen <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal
<hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin
Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
<john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>;
Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi
<bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q
<qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>;
Thomas
Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; yangh...@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan
<yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>
Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test
Hi all,
Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4.
The planned date for the final release is 25th April.
Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and
report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the
final release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the
release notes.
A release candidate tarball can be found at:
https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1
These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
Thanks.
Kevin
HI All,
Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1
validation test rate is 85%. No critical issue is found.
2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev.
New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues
1.
pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac:
performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet
2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under
investigating
# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with
latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as
Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4,
FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package
Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible
Descriptor, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including
PF/VF single core performance test, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic
test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
- On going.
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as
PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf
testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
- All test done. found bug1.
* Cryptodev:
*Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API
testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
- Execution rate is 90%. found bug2.
*Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput
Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
Regards,
Xu, Hailin
Update the test status for Intel part. completed dpdk21.11.4-rc1 all
validation. No critical issue is found.
Hi. Thanks for testing.
2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev.
New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues
1.
pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac:
performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 --not fix yet, Only the
specified platform exists
Do you know which patch caaused the regression? I'm not fully clear
from the Bz for 20.11. The backported patch ID'd as root cause [0] in
20.11 is in the previous releases of 20.11 (and 21.11).
Trying to understand because then it would have shown in testing for
previous releases. Or is this a new test introduced for latest LTS
releases? and if so, what is the baseline performance based on?
[0]
commit 1c9a7fba5c90e0422b517404499ed106f647bcff
Author: Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon Jul 11 14:11:32 2022 +0200
net: accept unaligned data in checksum routines
2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under
investigating
ok, thank you.
Hi, it was mentioned in a separate mail that the performance drop issue was
not the same as 20.11.
Is there any update on that and the failing virtio tests ? Is there a regression
introduced since in 21.11.4 ?
