> -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:35 PM > To: Xu, HailinX <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John > <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q > <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>; Peng, > Yuan <[email protected]>; Chen, Zhaoyan <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test > > On 20/04/2023 11:32, Kevin Traynor wrote: > > On 20/04/2023 03:40, Xu, HailinX wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Xu, HailinX <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:13 PM > >>> To: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >>> Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > <[email protected]>; > >>> Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; Walker, Benjamin > >>> <[email protected]>; David Christensen > >>> <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > <[email protected]>; > >>> Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob > >>> <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>; > >>> Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi > >>> <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q > >>> <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; > Thomas > >>> Monjalon <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Peng, Yuan > >>> <[email protected]>; Chen, Zhaoyan <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> > >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > >>>> <[email protected]>; Ali Alnubani > >>>> <[email protected]>; Walker, Benjamin <[email protected]>; > >>>> David Christensen <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > >>>> <[email protected]>; Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Jerin > >>>> Jacob <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John > >>>> <[email protected]>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; > >>>> Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi > >>>> <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q > >>>> <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; > >>> Thomas > >>>> Monjalon <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Peng, Yuan > >>>> <[email protected]>; Chen, Zhaoyan <[email protected]> > >>>> Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4. > >>>> > >>>> The planned date for the final release is 25th April. > >>>> > >>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and > >>>> report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the > >>>> final release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the > release notes. > >>>> > >>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at: > >>>> > >>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1 > >>>> > >>>> These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > >>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Kevin > >>> > >>> HI All, > >>> > >>> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 > >>> validation test rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. > >>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. > >>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues > >>> 1. > pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: > >>> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets > >>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet > >>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under > investigating > >>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > >>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with > >>> latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as > >>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, > >>> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. > >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > >>> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > >>> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > >>> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > >>> Descriptor, etc. > >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including > >>> PF/VF single core performance test, etc. > >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic > >>> test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > >>> - On going. > >>> > >>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > >>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > >>> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > >>> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. > >>> - All test done. found bug1. > >>> * Cryptodev: > >>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API > >>> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > >>> - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2. > >>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput > >>> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. > >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Xu, Hailin > >> Update the test status for Intel part. completed dpdk21.11.4-rc1 all > validation. No critical issue is found. > > > > Hi. Thanks for testing. > > > >> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. > >> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues > >> 1. > pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: > performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets > >> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 --not fix yet, Only the > >> specified platform exists > > > > Do you know which patch caaused the regression? I'm not fully clear > > from the Bz for 20.11. The backported patch ID'd as root cause [0] in > > 20.11 is in the previous releases of 20.11 (and 21.11). > > > > Trying to understand because then it would have shown in testing for > > previous releases. Or is this a new test introduced for latest LTS > > releases? and if so, what is the baseline performance based on? > > > > [0] > > commit 1c9a7fba5c90e0422b517404499ed106f647bcff > > Author: Mattias Rönnblom <[email protected]> > > Date: Mon Jul 11 14:11:32 2022 +0200 > > > > net: accept unaligned data in checksum routines > > > >> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under > >> investigating > > > > ok, thank you. > > > > Hi, it was mentioned in a separate mail that the performance drop issue was > not the same as 20.11. > > Is there any update on that and the failing virtio tests ? Is there a > regression > introduced since in 21.11.4 ?
Found bad commit id: commit c41493361c87e730459ead9311c68528eb0874aa Author: Boleslav Stankevich <[email protected]> Date: Fri Mar 3 14:19:29 2023 +0300 net/virtio: deduce IP length for TSO checksum We try this issue on 3 different platforms Performance drop only found on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8280M CPU @ 2.70GHz CPU. Regards, Xu, Hailin > > thanks, > Kevin, > > > Kevin. > > > >> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > >> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest > GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as > >> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, > FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. > >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > Descriptor, etc. > >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF > single core performance test, etc. > >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - > QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >> > >> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > >> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. > >> - All test done. found bug1. > >> * Cryptodev: > >> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API > testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > >> - All test done. found bug2. > >> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput > Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. > >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Xu, Hailin > >> > >
