Hi, Kevin RedHat QE does not find new issues about the v21.11.4-rc1 dpdk during the tests.
We tested below 18 scenarios and all got PASS on RHEL9: - Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS - Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS - Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing: PASS - PVP (host dpdk testpmd as vswitch) 1Q: throughput testing: PASS - PVP vhost-user 2Q throughput testing: PASS - PVP vhost-user 1Q - cross numa node throughput testing: PASS - Guest with vhost-user 2 queues throughput testing: PASS - vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server qemu reconnect: PASS - vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server ovs reconnect: PASS - PVP reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: PASS - PVP 1Q live migration testing: PASS - PVP 1Q cross numa node live migration testing: PASS - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing: PASS - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing (2M): PASS - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing: PASS - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 4Q live migration testing: PASS - Host PF + DPDK testing: PASS - Host VF + DPDK testing: PASS Test Versions: - qemu-kvm-6.2.0 - kernel 5.14 - dpdk 21.11.4-rc1 git log -1 commit f7dce59377b34750fdda7d1780d527233c84663f Author: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> Date: Thu Apr 6 09:11:25 2023 +0100 version: 21.11.4-rc1 Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> - Test device : X540-AT2 NIC(ixgbe, 10G) Best Regards, YangHang Liu On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 2:13 PM Xu, HailinX <hailinx...@intel.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM > > To: sta...@dpdk.org > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; > > Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin > > <benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; > > Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian > > <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John > > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin > > Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Pei > > Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan > > Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon > > <tho...@monjalon.net>; yangh...@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan > > <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com> > > Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test > > > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4. > > > > The planned date for the final release is 25th April. > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any > > issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the > fixes and > > reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1 > > > > These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > Thanks. > > > > Kevin > > HI All, > > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 validation > test rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. > 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. > New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues > 1. pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: > performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet > 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under > investigating > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest > GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as > Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, > FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > Descriptor, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF > single core performance test, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test > - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > - On going. > > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. > - All test done. found bug1. > * Cryptodev: > *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API > testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2. > *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput > Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > > Regards, > Xu, Hailin > >
