> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM
> To: sta...@dpdk.org
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>;
> Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> <benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian
> <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin
> Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Pei
> Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan
> Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <tho...@monjalon.net>; yangh...@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan
> <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>
> Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4.
> 
> The planned date for the final release is 25th April.
> 
> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any
> issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes 
> and
> reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> 
> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> 
>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1
> 
> These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kevin

HI All,

Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 validation test 
rate is 85%. No critical issue is found.
2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev.
New bugs:   --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues
  1. pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: performance 
drop about 23.5% when send small packets 
        https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212    -- no fix yet
  2. some of the virtio tests are failing:    -- Intel dev is under 
investigating
# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang 
version and the popular OS revision such as
  Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, FreeBSD13.1, 
SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum 
offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. 
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum 
offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.                
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow 
Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single 
core performance test, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - 
QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
- On going.
                
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as 
PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE 
ESXI 8.0, etc.
- All test done. found bug1.
* Cryptodev: 
  *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev 
ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
    - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2.
  *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance/Cryptodev 
Latency, etc.
    - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.

Regards,
Xu, Hailin

Reply via email to