19/04/2022 12:14, Akhil Goyal:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > 16/04/2022 21:25, Akhil Goyal:
> > > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > > @@ -3828,6 +3828,12 @@ enum rte_eth_event_ipsec_subtype {
> > > RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_TIME_EXPIRY,
> > > /** Soft byte expiry of SA */
> > > RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_BYTE_EXPIRY,
> > > + /** Soft packet expiry of SA */
> >
> > Is there a reference explaining what exactly is a "soft packet expiry"?
>
> SA expiry is a very common procedure in case of IPsec.
> And all stacks must support this feature.
> You can refer
> https://docs.strongswan.org/strongswan-docs/5.9/config/rekeying.html
> For details.
> Time expiry means after x seconds SA will expire.
> Packet expiry means after x packets processing SA will expire.
> Byte expiry means after x bytes of packet processing SA will expire.
I think you should use the syntax @ref packets_soft_limit
so it is clear where the event come from.
> > I think you should also mention what should be done
> > in the event handler.
>
> I believe this is quite obvious as per IPsec specifications.
> Application need to start rekeying or SA need to be created again.
Yes indeed.
> > > + RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_PKT_EXPIRY,
> > > + /** Hard byte expiry of SA */
> > > + RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_BYTE_HARD_EXPIRY,
> > > + /** Hard packet expiry of SA */
> > > + RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_PKT_HARD_EXPIRY,
> >
> > Same comment for the 3 events.
> >
> > > /** Max value of this enum */
> > > RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_MAX
> > > };
> >
> > What is the impact of this "MAX" value on ABI compatibility?
>
> I see no issues reported while running ABI check.
> There is no array being used inside library based on MAX.
No need of array inside the library, the events are exposed to the app.
I'm surprised libabigail is OK with changing an enum value.
