On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:47 AM fengchengwen <fengcheng...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021/10/20 14:59, David Marchand wrote:
> > No need to expose rte_dma_devices out of the dmadev library.
> > Existing helpers should be enough, and inlines make use of
> > rte_dma_fp_objs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_dmadev.c | 5 +++--
> > lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c | 2 +-
> > lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev_pmd.h | 2 --
> > lib/dmadev/version.map | 1 -
> > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_dmadev.c b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> > index 1e327bd45f..8b58256afc 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> > @@ -747,10 +747,11 @@ test_dmadev_instance(int16_t dev_id)
> > };
> > const int vchan = 0;
> >
> > + rte_dma_info_get(dev_id, &info);
>
> suggest declare info as: struct rte_dma_stats info = { 0 };
> so that the following %s will display NULL if rte_dma_info_get call fail.
The problem is more generic.
Other info fields are used by the test.
If rte_dma_info_get can fail, its return code must be checked.
Worth a followup patch, can you send it?
Thanks.
--
David Marchand
