W dniu 06.05.2020 o 11:02, Praveen Shetty pisze:
> Function create_ipsec_esp_flow returns a negative number in case of any
> failure. But passing negative number to strerror is causing the coverity
> issue.
> In case of failure, displaying exact error message to console is handled
> in create_ipsec_esp_flow function.So it is not required to print the
> error message again using strerror.
> This patch will remove the unnecessary calling of strerror function
> to fix the coverity issue.
>
> Coverity issue: 357691
> Fixes: 6738c0a95695 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support flow director")
> Cc: praveen.she...@intel.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Shetty <praveen.she...@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> index e3a1a5aff..632482176 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
> @@ -1223,8 +1223,7 @@ sa_add_rules(struct sa_ctx *sa_ctx, const struct
> ipsec_sa entries[],
> rc = create_ipsec_esp_flow(sa);
> if (rc != 0)
> RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC_ESP,
> - "create_ipsec_esp_flow() failed %s\n",
> - strerror(rc));
> + "create_ipsec_esp_flow() failed\n");
> }
> print_one_sa_rule(sa, inbound);
> }
great!, especially that create_ipsec_esp_flow returns mostly -1 in case
of errors and that would be -EPERM ;)
Acked-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com>
--
Lukasz Wojciechowski
Principal Software Engineer
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Office +48 22 377 88 25
l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com
