Hi Akhil, > -----Original Message----- > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.go...@nxp.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:43 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; > Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; > ano...@marvell.com; jer...@marvell.com > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default > > > > > > 11/10/2019 14:40, Akhil Goyal: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact > > > user > > experience > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to > customers. > > > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality > > > added every > > release. > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. > > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a default > > in this example? > > > > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would request > other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance numbers.
Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing. Regards, Bernard.
