> > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact > > > > > user > > > > experience > > > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to > > > customers. > > > > > > > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality > > > > > added every > > > > release. > > > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. > > > > > > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a default > > > > in this example? > > > > > > > > > > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would request > > > other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance numbers. > > > > Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing. > > > > We were observing about 4-5% drop when using the ipsec-lib instead of the > Legacy code path. We would again measure it on RC1.
Yeh, I remember you already mentioned that few months ago... Though we don't have access to NXP HW, so obviously we do need some help from you guys here to address it: configuration/test details so we can try to reproduce it probably some insight from you what in particular causing that slowdown.. patches would be even better :) Konstantin > That is why I say, I will > Hold this patch till RC2, unless some other vendor also confirms that.
