Hi Bernard, > > Hi Akhil, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 11/10/2019 14:40, Akhil Goyal: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact > > > > > > user > > > > > experience > > > > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to > > > > customers. > > > > > > > > > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality > > > > > > added every > > > > > release. > > > > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. > > > > > > > > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a > > > > > default in this example? > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would > > > > request other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance > > numbers. > > > > > > Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing. > > > > > > > We were observing about 4-5% drop when using the ipsec-lib instead of the > > Legacy code path. We would again measure it on RC1. That is why I say, I > > will > > Hold this patch till RC2, unless some other vendor also confirms that. > > Is there any update on performance measurements on 19.11-rc1 ? > The performance impact of this patch is huge ~10% w.r.t. 19.11-rc1 base on NXP hardware.
We cannot merge this. Anoob also reported performance issues on Marvell hardware. > Regards, > > Bernard.
