On Thu, 16 May 2019 13:46:58 +0200 Jakub Grajciar <jgraj...@cisco.com> wrote:
> +enum memif_role_t { > + MEMIF_ROLE_MASTER, > + MEMIF_ROLE_SLAVE, > +}; Because master/slave terminology is potentially culturally offensive it is flagged by many corporate source scanning tools. Could you use primary/secondary in memif instead?