On 06/03, Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong...@intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 9:43 AM
>> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
>> <jgraj...@cisco.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface
>> (memif) PMD
>> 
>> Minor nit, this should be a V1 instead of V10 after your RFC.
>
>I'll keep that in mind, but what version number should I use in the next 
>patch, since I did use V10 in this one?
>
I am not sure what's DPDK convention for this case, Maybe Ferruh can suggest
on this.

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>Thanks,
>Jakub

Reply via email to