03/10/2018 09:57, Jerin Jacob: > From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com> > > 1. I'm not sure that it is OK that mbuf and ethdev changes go in one patch. > > It seems typically mbuf changes go separately and mbuf changes should > > be applied to main dpdk repo. > > I don't have strong opinion on this. If there are no other objection, I > will split the patch further as mbuf and ethdev as you pointed out.
Those flags are handled in mbuf and ethdev. As it is closely related, I think it is better to get the changes in one patch, as you did.
