03/10/2018 10:02, Ferruh Yigit: > On 10/3/2018 8:58 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com> > >> The question about mbuf and ethdev changes separation is applicable here as > >> well. I have no strong opinion, but I think it would be good to follow. > > > > I don't have strong opinion on this. If there are no other objection, I > > will split the patch further as mbuf and ethdev as you pointed out. > > Since they are logically related, it make sense to have them together to me.
+1 for keeping ethdev/mbuf together. No problem applying such mbuf change in dpdk-next-net.
