2014-10-22 19:53, Helin Zhang: > +#define RTE_BIT_WIDTH_64 (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(uint64_t))
How can it be different of 64? Using 64 would be simpler to understand than RTE_BIT_WIDTH_64. > + uint8_t reta[RTE_BIT_WIDTH_64]; /**< 64 redirection table entries. */ Even your comment is saying that it's 64. -- Thomas