Hi all, I will prepare and start a VOTE for Doris 1.0.0
-- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org 在 2022-03-19 22:03:39，"陈明雨" <morning...@163.com> 写道： >Thanks for Willem's review. >And yes, the licenses of all thirdparties that Doris depends on are compatible >with APLv2. >Some of them are dual licenses and I have chosen the one that is compatible >with APLv2. > > > >-- > >此致！Best Regards >陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > >Email: >chenmin...@apache.org > > > > > >At 2022-03-19 20:59:02, "Willem Jiang" <willem.ji...@gmail.com> wrote: >>I just found there is a License file of LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt in the >>licenses directory. >>It was introduced by the blow License. >>CDDL + GPLv2 with classpath exception -- licenses/LICENSE-CDDL-1.0.txt >>& licenses/LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt >> >>After checking the explanation here[1], I think it's fine for us to use. >>https://www.whitesourcesoftware.com/resources/blog/top-9-gpl-with-the-classpath-exception-questions-answered/#6_What_is_the_difference_between_the_GPL_with_a_Classpath_Exception_and_the_GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License_LGPL >> >> >>Willem Jiang >> >>Twitter: willemjiang >>Weibo: 姜宁willem >> >> >> >>Twitter: willemjiang >>Weibo: 姜宁willem >> >>On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:03 PM 陈明雨 <morning...@163.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> we are going to make a "binary release" of Doris 1.0. >>> >>> The purpose of starting this discussion is to ask for help in reviewing >>> whether the binary release related preparations are correct. >>> >>> The main purpose is to review the composition of the final output package: >>> (see the attachment, it is all empty folders, mainly for reviewing >>> structure and license) >>> >>> >>> - "fe", "be" and "broker" are Doris' module directories, which contain the >>> binary programs. >>> >>> - LICENSE-dist.txt is the LICENSE for the binary release, which contains >>> the index of all third-party dependent licenses, in addition to the Apache >>> License V2. >>> >>> - licenses/ has all the license files of third-party dependencies under it. >>> >>> >>> ./ >>> >>> ├── be >>> >>> │ ├── bin >>> >>> │ ├── conf >>> >>> │ └── lib >>> >>> ├── broker >>> >>> │ ├── bin >>> >>> │ ├── conf >>> >>> │ └── lib >>> >>> ├── fe >>> >>> │ ├── bin >>> >>> │ ├── conf >>> >>> │ └── lib >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-dist.txt >>> >>> ├── NOTICE.txt >>> >>> └── licenses >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-CC0.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-CDDL-1.0.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-CDDL-1.1.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-CUP.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-EDL-1.0.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-EPL-1.0.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-EPL-2.0.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-JSch.txt >>> >>> ├── LICENSE-MIT.txt >>> >>> ├── .... >>> >>> >>> Is that all we need to make a binary release? >>> Please take time to help review. >>> Thank you! >>> >>> -- >>> >>> 此致！Best Regards >>> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen >>> >>> Email: >>> chenmin...@apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@doris.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@doris.apache.org >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@doris.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@doris.apache.org
