+1
I think this will be a good start, the various problems encountered by the community in compiling doris will be solved, lowering the threshold of doris installation and deployment, looking forward to the release of the 1.0 binary installer. Jiafeng.Zhang Email ：jiafengzh...@apache.org ------------------ Original ------------------ From: 陈明雨 <morning...@163.com> Date: Sat,Mar 19,2022 8:03 PM To: doris-dev <dev@doris.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Doris binary release preparation Hi all, we are going to make a "binary release" of Doris 1.0. The purpose of starting this discussion is to ask for help in reviewing whether the binary release related preparations are correct. The main purpose is to review the composition of the final output package: (see the attachment, it is all empty folders, mainly for reviewing structure and license) - "fe", "be" and "broker" are Doris' module directories, which contain the binary programs. - LICENSE-dist.txt is the LICENSE for the binary release, which contains the index of all third-party dependent licenses, in addition to the Apache License V2. - licenses/ has all the license files of third-party dependencies under it. ./ ├── be │├── bin │├── conf │└── lib ├── broker │├── bin │├── conf │└── lib ├── fe │├── bin │├── conf │└── lib ├── LICENSE-dist.txt ├── NOTICE.txt └── licenses ├── LICENSE-CC0.txt ├── LICENSE-CDDL-1.0.txt ├── LICENSE-CDDL-1.1.txt ├── LICENSE-CUP.txt ├── LICENSE-EDL-1.0.txt ├── LICENSE-EPL-1.0.txt ├── LICENSE-EPL-2.0.txt ├── LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt ├── LICENSE-JSch.txt ├── LICENSE-MIT.txt ├── .... Is that all we need to make a binary release? Please take time to help review. Thank you! -- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org
