Thanks for Willem's review. And yes, the licenses of all thirdparties that Doris depends on are compatible with APLv2. Some of them are dual licenses and I have chosen the one that is compatible with APLv2.
-- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org At 2022-03-19 20:59:02, "Willem Jiang" <willem.ji...@gmail.com> wrote: >I just found there is a License file of LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt in the >licenses directory. >It was introduced by the blow License. >CDDL + GPLv2 with classpath exception -- licenses/LICENSE-CDDL-1.0.txt >& licenses/LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt > >After checking the explanation here[1], I think it's fine for us to use. >https://www.whitesourcesoftware.com/resources/blog/top-9-gpl-with-the-classpath-exception-questions-answered/#6_What_is_the_difference_between_the_GPL_with_a_Classpath_Exception_and_the_GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License_LGPL > > >Willem Jiang > >Twitter: willemjiang >Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > >Twitter: willemjiang >Weibo: 姜宁willem > >On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:03 PM 陈明雨 <morning...@163.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> we are going to make a "binary release" of Doris 1.0. >> >> The purpose of starting this discussion is to ask for help in reviewing >> whether the binary release related preparations are correct. >> >> The main purpose is to review the composition of the final output package: >> (see the attachment, it is all empty folders, mainly for reviewing structure >> and license) >> >> >> - "fe", "be" and "broker" are Doris' module directories, which contain the >> binary programs. >> >> - LICENSE-dist.txt is the LICENSE for the binary release, which contains the >> index of all third-party dependent licenses, in addition to the Apache >> License V2. >> >> - licenses/ has all the license files of third-party dependencies under it. >> >> >> ./ >> >> ├── be >> >> │ ├── bin >> >> │ ├── conf >> >> │ └── lib >> >> ├── broker >> >> │ ├── bin >> >> │ ├── conf >> >> │ └── lib >> >> ├── fe >> >> │ ├── bin >> >> │ ├── conf >> >> │ └── lib >> >> ├── LICENSE-dist.txt >> >> ├── NOTICE.txt >> >> └── licenses >> >> ├── LICENSE-CC0.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-CDDL-1.0.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-CDDL-1.1.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-CUP.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-EDL-1.0.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-EPL-1.0.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-EPL-2.0.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-JSch.txt >> >> ├── LICENSE-MIT.txt >> >> ├── .... >> >> >> Is that all we need to make a binary release? >> Please take time to help review. >> Thank you! >> >> -- >> >> 此致！Best Regards >> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen >> >> Email: >> chenmin...@apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@doris.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@doris.apache.org > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@doris.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@doris.apache.org
