Sally, this initiative is fantastic, thank you for articulating it and bringing 
it to life. This is a strong example that the ASF put community over code.

re:Sharan's comments. I agree with the steps proposed, and here's how I'd like 
to contribute: 

1) Drafting Guidelines and Process - Happy to contribute Guidelines for this, 
perhaps taking some of what I suggested for Beam [1]. I'm also interested in 
providing input for the process. Could we do this over a call or collaborative 
document? How should we proceed here?

2) Providing Support & Mentoring - I'm happy to become a mentor for new 
projects in the incubator and projects looking to expand their non-code 
contributors. Also happy to produce a slide deck on the importance of 
recognizing these contributions and how to build a process to do it. 

3) Cleanup & Maintain Help Wanted - This is something I wasn't aware of and 
looks good! I'd love to help revamp this, it looks like a central-service 
repository for projects. I'd need to learn how to maintain it in the background 
and how we go about this. I agree with Sharan that we need to promote more the 
use of this and keep it clean and updated. I can help with this, but I won't 
have the bandwidth until March. 

>From this points - How should we move forward Sally?

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6a592632766d999d02922efab439348caa5c91da6e75eab2ab71f7ec@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E

On 2019/01/10 08:53:43, Sally Khudairi <s...@apache.org> wrote: 
> Hello ComDev-ers! I hope you are all well and that your 2019 is looking 
> bright thus far.
> 
> I wanted to share my proposal for recognizing non-technical contributions at 
> the ASF. Whilst some of us have spoken about this issue for many years, this 
> discussion formalized during ApacheCon Montreal (September 2018; select 
> excerpts at the end of this message) and moved onto the ASF Members list for 
> review and vetting.
> 
> We have received both signoff from VP ComDev Sharan Foga, as well as careful 
> consideration and positive feedback from more than a dozen Members.
> 
> Let's proceed!
> 
> Proposed Contribution Process for Non-Technical tasks:
> 
> 1) Contributions must be associated with an existing ASF project or 
> committee. For example:
> 
>   - Creating supporting graphics for ASF Marketing & Publicity
> 
>   - Providing marketing support for an Apache TLP
> 
>   - Onboarding new contributors to an Apache podling community
> 
>   - Developing a new Website for an existing project
> 
>   - Participating in Apache Community Development activities --staffing the 
> ASF booth, coordinating events, etc.
> 
>   - Writing project/process documentation
> 
>   - Helping with ASF Operations activities --legal/accounting support, etc.
> 
> ...there are more ways folks can contribute. We just need to give them the 
> ability to do so.
> 
> 2) The TLP/podling/committee involved must have at least one community member 
> (internal; e.g. PMC) to help provide guidance on the task/activity involved, 
> and at least three PMC Members who may be able to nominate the individual for 
> Committership, as per the ASF's established contributor > committer process 
> http://community.apache.org/contributors/index.html .
> 
> 3) All project/committee participants are encouraged to sign an ASF ICLA in 
> order to have their contributions recognized.
> 
> 4) Recognition must happen on-list.
> 
> 5) All PMCs and podlings are encouraged to consider non-code contributions 
> and establish their own sub-processes for determining how to accept, 
> integrate, and recognize non-technical participation. 
> 
> 6) Recommend that a team of advisors for this process operate under ComDev, 
> and for any serious issues to be escalated to the ASF President and the 
> individuals identified in the ASF Code of Conduct who act as ombudspeople for 
> conflict resolution.
> 
> 7) Recommend that all non-ASF-Member-confidential tasks/Requests for 
> Assistance be posted publicly on https://helpwanted.apache.org/ ...the form 
> makes it easy to do so! The related details on the tasks themselves may be 
> published on a project's JIRA, blog post, mailing list, Webpage, community 
> forum, Slack channel, etc.
> 
> 8) Projects/committees are encouraged to share their initiatives with ASF 
> Marketing & Publicity <pr...@apache.org> for additional visibility across ASF 
> communication channels.
> 
> ...as we build the program, I'm sure we'll be able to flesh out more details 
> and areas of activity.
> 
> And to kick it off, ASF Marketing & Publicity have some graphics/creative 
> tasks that we will be leading as part of a "Central Services sub-group" under 
> our committee. We will be posting details on blogs.apache.org and promoted to 
> the greater community. Those who are creatively inclined and are able to help 
> are welcome to join us.
> 
> I hope the proposed process will help encourage broader participation. In my 
> review with Sharan, she wrote: 
> 
> > ... this is just the sort of thing I think Comdev could be doing. It is 
> > also something that could focus us a bit better. 
> >
> > So +1 from me. 
> 
> 
> Thank you in advance for taking this under the ComDev umbrella and helping 
> pave the way for a more inclusive, robust community. Once you're ready to 
> proceed, I'll be happy to forward/socialize the process to the PMCs if needed.
> 
> Feel free to let me know if you have any questions or how I can otherwise be 
> of help.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sally (ASF's first non-technical member!)
> 
> - - -
> Vice President Marketing & Publicity
> Vice President Sponsor Relations
> The Apache Software Foundation
> 
> Tel +1 617 921 8656 | s...@apache.org
> 
> = = =
> 
> [BACKGROUND/CONTEXT; excepted from my emails to ASF Members]
> 
> <snip>
> 
> During ApacheCon, there were many discussions about two things:
> 
> 1)  "diversity". A pattern was clearly emerging:
>    a) diversity of humanity --one's DNA/gender/ethnicity/background/life 
> choices, etc.
>    b) diversity of contribution --promotion, community building, onboarding, 
> outreach, etc.
> 
> 2) "(more efficient) ways to get non-code stuff done":
>    a) semi-one-off instances --graphics/logos, marketing/media assistance, 
> etc.
>    b) longer-term items --technical writing, documentation, case studies, etc.
>    c) ongoing support --community building, onboarding/guidance, events 
> coordination, etc.
> 
> 
> As a firm believer in our process/principles of meritocracy, our often don't 
> knowing who you are is a good thing: if you make decent contributions, 
> there’s a chance that you will be able to establish yourself in the Apache 
> community. Your work should speak for itself. However, it can be difficult 
> for some folks to participate if there’s no clear entry path for them to do 
> so.
> 
> Much of the history behind what's being discussed goes as far back as my 
> initial participation in the ASF (1999), but the issue became pronounced in 
> 2004. Here's what happened:
> 
> A certain Web Services-oriented company was heavily involved with a few 
> Apache projects. Not only had they submitted a project to the Incubator, they 
> had a handful of very active committers on their payroll. Their products were 
> Apache-dependent and they worked very hard to bring visibility to their team, 
> their contributions, and, of course, their products (driving sales, and all). 
> Their marketing director wanted to get involved with promoting the project 
> itself, but the PMC said "no, go away". Although their hands were tied, they 
> kept trying different approaches, but were continually rebuffed. Eventually 
> that person left and the company tried again, this time using their community 
> manager. There was a little progress (remnants of "after all, can't trust a 
> marketing person"-itis), but there was still considerable frustration.
> 
> Through the years, I've regularly received requests to help projects with 
> their marketing and promotions beyond the "Foundation"-level support already 
> provided.The request often comes from a corporate that's heavily invested in 
> the project. And, of course, my answer is "sorry, no", aside from the 
> experiment where I joined a podling that had considerable marketing resources 
> prior to coming to the Incubator, and they had assigned an individual 
> specifically to oversee that project's marketing. I joined the pPMC's new 
> (private) press and (public) marketing lists, and was engaged somewhat 
> passively, and was definitely not driving the effort. A year later, the 
> dedicated marketer jumped ship to their competitor and the project has been 
> struggling to manage this 
> on their own. I eventually unsubscribed from their lists after some years.
> 
> The reality is that this is not a unique situation. Many projects have active 
> users with their own marketing and PR teams who get assigned to help out in 
> any way possible, and more often than not, the end result gives off the 
> impression that CompanyX "owns" or appears to be inappropriately influencing 
> the project, which, in turn, causes Brand Management, Marketing & Publicity, 
> and at times even the ASF Board to intervene. Those who have been on the 
> receiving end know that you don't want me to come after you <g>.
> 
> PMCs often want to focus on code and community-builing, and rightfully so, 
> considering that they are the two areas that we actively target/hone our 
> resources. Yet our projects often also need additional support in the form of 
> documentation, graphics/Website development, community events management, 
> marketing/PR/AR, and more. This may not be a full-time role within the 
> project, yet is valuable and necessary to be coordinating with several ASF 
> groups (Brand Management, M&P, ComDev, 
> etc.). Plus, very few technologists/developers/software engineer-types are 
> interested/skilled in these areas.
> 
> <...>
> 
> *Recognizing Contributors and Contributions.***
> 
> Let's get more people to help with the heavy lifting. Reduce resentment due 
> to lack of recognition. Reduce volunteer fatigue and burnout.
> 
> We need to establish participation guidelines/requirements. Allow others to 
> offer assistance --even if it’s only for a single project to start. To ensure 
> parity and promote collaboration, any contributor interested in supporting 
> any Apache project will need to participate on the respective Central 
> Services’ list(s).
> 
> Contributors will be encouraged to help each other out and work through 
> issues together. A "no silo-ing" policy will be enforced.
> 
> Get on the list, prove yourself, get your wings.
> 
> <...>
> 
> I wish others could help drive some of these activities because, #LoveApache.
> 
> </snip>
> 
> # # #
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to