In 2015 I asked a similar quiestion in this same forum. See [1]. I may shed some light.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a4095177b9630643c8957e91b1e1b977b521db170767eb17eccec9f7@1426899898@%3Cdev.community.apache.org%3E Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Joseph Schaefer < joe_schae...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > The downside to majority rule when it comes to personnel voting is that it > can lead to a situation where a company having a majority on the pmc can > increase their majority by voting in additional employees without the > minority having any way to provide a check on that exercise of power. Yes > this has come up in the past. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 28, 2017, at 8:03 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > on https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#new-committer-process > it > > describes the process of bringing in a new committer for a "typical > > project". > > > > But in the "Discussion" it speaks of "3 +1 and no vetoes"... Is it really > > "typical" that projects use vetoes for new committers? I can't recall > > seeing that anywhere, not saying it is incorrect, but asking whether it > > really is "typical". > > > > Perhaps we should provide links to a handful of well-known project's > > processes, to both give a template for projects to work with as well as > > different approaches. > > > > Anyone has any opinion on this matter? > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >
