On 03/29/2017 09:00 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: >> Recall at a time, EVERYONE at Apache, and our projects, were fully >> volunteer with unknown and widely varying cycles of free time. We >> understood the ebb-and-flow of available time as an unaligned >> volunteer and based some of our core tenets around that. That's >> why, for example, merit doesn't expire. We realized that some >> time you have time, and some time you don't. >> >> So we never wanted to "penalize" people who were infrequent or >> had inconsistent time. Withholding PMC membership simply based >> on that seems very, very wrong to me. > > This depends on what you task the PMC with. I prefer that a PMC leave > most rule-making to the committers at large If the PMC is mostly > about approving new committers, then I Jim's interpretation makes a > lot of sense.
I would suggest that if you give that responsibility to the committers at large, that's an opportunity to invite them all onto the PMC. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
