2014-03-15 8:18 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>:

> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Niall Pemberton
> <niall.pember...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > 2014-03-12 13:37 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> > > [X] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm sorry to say but it is not possible to tell how to use this
> >> > components
> >> > > by looking at the site.
> >> > >
> >> > > The text descriptions could not be more terse and is devoid of
> >> examples.
> >> > > Finding the modules requires drilling down the site. The modules AND
> >> > > examples should be listed in the main menu. Preferably a user docs
> >> page
> >> > > should exist.
> >> > >
> >> > > Drilling down to the privilizer example source xref [1] is not
> helpful
> >> > > since the code has no comments.
> >> > >
> >> > > There appears to be a hierarchy of modules which is only
> discoverable
> >> by
> >> > > drilling down the whole site. For example, on
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.0-rc3/commons-weaver-processor/index.html
> >> > >
> >> > > there are two modules with the exact same kind of description and no
> >> > guide
> >> > > lines for when to use which one, unless you guess by the name of
> >> course
> >> > ;)
> >> > > No good enough IMO.
> >> > >
> >> > > The page starts with "This module provides the
> >> > > org.apache.commons:commons-weaver artifact." which are Maven
> concepts
> >> > > related to building Weaver itself or installing it for use in your
> >> > > IDE/editor. This shows to me that the docs need a "Building" and
> >> > > "Installing" section like some other sites have which tell you how
> to
> >> do
> >> > > just that, building and installing.
> >> > >
> >> > > I do not see how this component can be released without telling
> folks
> >> how
> >> > > to use it!
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > We're still voting on source code here. The site is only a nice to
> have
> >> > imho. If you find yourself unable to verify the release (because you
> can
> >> > not tell how to use the component), from my PoV a -0 would be
> >> appropriate.
> >> > But casting a veto because the website is incomplete doesn't fit into
> >> the
> >> > "release early, release often" credo we have agreed upon.
> >>
> >>
> >> Bear in mind, releases cannot be vetoed. ;)
> >
> >
> >  Doesn't seem like Gary is asking for much. Is it not possible to improve
> > the website and achieve a consensus?
> >
> > Of course it is possible, but it's not necessarily quick or "not much."
> One thing Gary has asked for is a "building" section. There is such a page
> linked from the root of [weaver]'s site. He has asked for installation
> instructions, which--lo and behold--are visible under the heading
> "Integration" on the front page of the [weaver] site. I admit to having let
> his request for a FAQ about the relationship between [weaver] and
> BCEL/ASM/Javassist slip my mind. I have expressed full willingness to
> improve the site, but since writing technical documentation is quite
> apparently a skill beyond my grasp, I'd love a little help or at least
> patience in that regard. Apache is supposed to be about community, but it's
> also supposed to be about doocracy. I've been fetching rocks on this
> project for a _year_ now in my ever-diminishing spare time, to the
> detriment of other ASF TLPs that could have been using it. When is the last
> time we've released a new Commons component? How many committers have we
> lost over the years due to our excessive navel-gazing? Come to that, where
> have you been for the past year or so, Niall? I have tried to retain a
> positive outlook for this community, but like so many others my patience is
> wearing thin. Please try to contain your collective shock when you don't
> see me bringing anything else new to Commons.
>
> FWIW, my +1 to the release. I'll keep the vote open until I get another
> binding +1 or I somehow manage to blindly stumble onto what it is people
> are looking for.
>

Hi Matt,

I intended to review RC3 today but I keep getting "404 -
ItemNotFoundException" when I try to access the staging repo. Can you help?

Benedikt


>
> Matt
>
>
> > Niall
> >
> >
> >
> >>  Matt
> >>
> >>
> >> > The website can
> >> > always be tweaked and republished.
> >> >
> >> > Having said that, I'll not have the time until friday to review this
> RC
> >> > myself :o)
> >> >
> >> > Benedikt
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Gary
> >> > >
> >> > > [1]
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.0-rc3/commons-weaver-modules-parent/commons-weaver-normalizer-parent/commons-weaver-normalizer-example/xref/index.html
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Matt Benson <mben...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 RC3 is available for review at:
> >> > > >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/weaver/ (r4624).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Maven artifacts are at:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1018/
> >> > > >  .
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Tested with Oracle JDKs 6, 7 and 8.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The Subversion tag is:
> >> > > >
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/weaver/tags/1.0_RC3/
> >> > > >  (r1576397).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Site:
> >> > > >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.0-rc3/index.html
> >> > > >
> >> > > > RAT Report:
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.0-rc3/rat-report.html
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Keys: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Changes since RC2:
> >> > > >  - Configured project to run a single all-inclusive RAT report
> >> > > >  - Added missing license headers
> >> > > >  - Included issueManagement in POM (and thus in generated site)
> >> > > >  - Documented resulting need for expanded permgen when generating
> >> site
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Changes since RC1:
> >> > > >  - Removed -dist suffix from distribution files
> >> > > >  - Added release notes to binary distribution
> >> > > >  - Included project-specific LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in jar
> >> > artifacts
> >> > > >  - Restricted checkstyle to run only for relevant modules
> >> > > >  - Fixed remaining checkstyle errors
> >> > > >  - Improved (somewhat) overview documentation
> >> > > >  - Removed license header from release notes
> >> > > >  - Added FindBugs and PMD reporting
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> >> > > >   This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e.
> after
> >> > > 0000UTC
> >> > > > 15-March 2014
> >> > > >
> >> > > >   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >> > > >   [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >> > > >   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >> > > >   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >> > > >
> >> > > >   Thanks!
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> >> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> >> > > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> >> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> >> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> >> > http://github.com/britter
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Reply via email to