I don't recall if a board report is required or not, but I would send one even if it isn't required. Obviously, the Solr team doesn't understand what they have done. However, if Solr considers CSV "good enough" to use in their application then it is definitely time to do a release of CSV.
Ralph On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > The Solr team isn't listening, the issue was closed as "Won't Fix", *sighs*... > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3204 > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > Le 06/03/2012 02:12, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> This is actually a bad joke for all of us binary compatibility lovers. I >> just noticed that Solr forked Commons CSV and released it as a separate >> artifact, but kept the org.apache.commons.csv package unchanged :( >> >> http://www.jarvana.com/jarvana/inspect/org/apache/solr/solr-commons-csv/3.5.0/solr-commons-csv-3.5.0.jar >> >> >> Not a very pleasant discovery. I don't know how to handle this yet. >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
