Le 06/03/2012 15:01, Ralph Goers a écrit : > I don't recall if a board report is required or not, but I would send one > even if it isn't required. Obviously, the Solr team doesn't understand what > they have done. However, if Solr considers CSV "good enough" to use in their > application then it is definitely time to do a release of CSV.
I'll update our report for this month. Luc > > Ralph > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> The Solr team isn't listening, the issue was closed as "Won't Fix", >> *sighs*... >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3204 >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> >> Le 06/03/2012 02:12, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is actually a bad joke for all of us binary compatibility lovers. I >>> just noticed that Solr forked Commons CSV and released it as a separate >>> artifact, but kept the org.apache.commons.csv package unchanged :( >>> >>> http://www.jarvana.com/jarvana/inspect/org/apache/solr/solr-commons-csv/3.5.0/solr-commons-csv-3.5.0.jar >>> >>> >>> Not a very pleasant discovery. I don't know how to handle this yet. >>> >>> Emmanuel Bourg >>> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
