James Carman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:01 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why change package names? Surely the API is compatible? If not, then a >> name change may be advisable even if staying with Java 1.4. >> > > Seems reasonable to me, but the question to be asked is, why do we > jump to 2.0 here? Is there really a revolutionary change going on?
The first release in 4 years? ;-) We had the discussion for io 2.0 and therefore vfs 2.0 is fine for me also. We have new providers and a lot of closed JIRA issues. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
