On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > Simply bumping the JDK requirement is enough to go from 1.x to 2.x IMO. >
Again, I'm going to harp on the consistency factor. If we go to 2.0 without changing artifactId and package, then future releases will be inconsistent. See other threads about this discussion, as I do not wish to re-hash it yet again. For this release, since it's binary compatible, we can leave it at 1.1 to avoid introducing an inconsistency. Others have argued that merely bumping JDK versions isn't necessarily a reason to go to a new major version. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
