> -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 09:52 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0 > > > On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:36 AM, James Carman wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> > >> As alternative: Can't we simply raise the minimum JDK level for VFS to 1.5 > >> also? > >> > > > > +1! Quit living in the past. Of course, we then have to discuss the > > package name (and thus artifact id) change. :) > > > > It seems we had that discussion before and agreed it was OK to jump to Java 5. > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg11705.html. I guess it > was never formally done. I had planned on doing some refactoring that I quess > I never got around to. > > Note that the minimum version for 1.0 was 1.3. Whoever started 2.0 changed the > minimum version to 1.4. > > If package names change it will require a bit of work. I'm not sure there is > anyone using 1.0. All the questions on the dev list have been for 2.0 for > quite some time.
FYI: We've been shipping with 1.0 for a long time and plan on upgrading to 2.0. We require Java 6 for all our Java apps. Gary > > Ralph > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
