On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Does EventListenerSupport provide anything useful besides a no-op > implementation? >
EventListenerSupport does. AbstractEventSupport IMO provides little over ELS: an Object event source, which in my experience is not necessarily the greatest paradigm to emulate anyway. -Matt > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, James Carman > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> My point was that one could just as easily add these methods to a >> subclass of EventListenerSupport. :) >>> >> >> +1, agree with Matt here. Why not just extend EventListenerSupport >> and add your custom fire* methods there? But, if you don't want to >> add custom fire methods (and you really don't need to with the proxied >> fire() method), then you can just use the EventListenerSupport class >> directly. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
