Does EventListenerSupport provide anything useful besides a no-op implementation?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, James Carman <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My point was that one could just as easily add these methods to a > subclass of EventListenerSupport. :) > > > > +1, agree with Matt here. Why not just extend EventListenerSupport > and add your custom fire* methods there? But, if you don't want to > add custom fire methods (and you really don't need to with the proxied > fire() method), then you can just use the EventListenerSupport class > directly. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
