I have a philosophical problem with EventListenerSupport extending
AbstractEventSupport. I look at the class names, and I ask what does the
concrete class do that AbstractEventSupport doesn't? I say either provide
one abstract class, or one concrete class, but not both.

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Paul:  As of now there are two options.  The first is to remove
> AbstractEventSupport in favor of EventListenerSupport.  The second is for
> EventListenerSupport to extend AbstractEventSupport.
>
> -Matt
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>
> > I looked at both in SVN and see convergence and not too much difference.
> Can
> > you guys agree to removing one? Which one? I know the classes are not
> > identical, but they are similar enough to go "hmmm".
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> >>
> >>> Does EventListenerSupport provide anything useful besides a no-op
> >>> implementation?
> >>>
> >>
> >> EventListenerSupport does.  AbstractEventSupport IMO provides little
> over
> >> ELS:  an Object event source, which in my experience is not necessarily
> the
> >> greatest paradigm to emulate anyway.
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, James Carman
> >>> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My point was that one could just as easily add these methods to a
> >>>> subclass of EventListenerSupport.  :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> +1, agree with Matt here.  Why not just extend EventListenerSupport
> >>>> and add your custom fire* methods there?  But, if you don't want to
> >>>> add custom fire methods (and you really don't need to with the proxied
> >>>> fire() method), then you can just use the EventListenerSupport class
> >>>> directly.
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to