On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like the compiler-checked aspect of your code, James, considering it > scratches an itch reminiscent of my current work in [proxy]. I'm happy for > your code to survive this POE. >
I think it reads very well, too. The fire() method used to be named getProxy(), but I like fire() much better because it makes it read like a sentence. I do believe I'm going to make the EventUtils.addEventListener() method private. It really doesn't add much value to outside folks. Its primary purpose is an implementation method for the other bindEventsToMethod() method. WDYT? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
