Phil Steitz a écrit : > Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: >> Phil, >> >>>> Right now, I see no option but avoiding the computation of A^tA. It is >>>> fair to ask for 2.2. >>> OK, so you are OK with keeping the fix version for this one at 2.2? >> Yes, I am. I will try to find a fix as soon as possible. If it turns out >> to be before the release of 2.1, it will go there. Otherwise, it will be >> in 2.2. > > Thanks! > > Any other opinions on the issues that I left marked 2.1? If others > are OK with this, I will move 321 and 351-352 to 2.2 and proceed to > cut a 2.1 RC.
This seems fine to me. Luc > > Phil >> Dim. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Dimitri Pourbaix * >> Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique * Don't worry, be happy >> CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO * and CARPE DIEM. >> Universite Libre de Bruxelles * >> Boulevard du Triomphe * Tel : +32-2-650.35.71 >> B-1050 Bruxelles * Fax : +32-2-650.42.26 >> http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix * mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
