Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Dimitri Pourbaix wrote:
>> Phil,
>>
>>>> Right now, I see no option but avoiding the computation of A^tA.  It is
>>>> fair to ask for 2.2.
>>> OK, so you are OK with keeping the fix version for this one at 2.2?
>> Yes, I am.  I will try to find a fix as soon as possible.  If it turns out
>> to be before the release of 2.1, it will go there.  Otherwise, it will be
>> in 2.2.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Any other opinions on the issues that I left marked 2.1?  If others
> are OK with this, I will move 321 and 351-352 to 2.2 and proceed to
> cut a 2.1 RC.

This seems fine to me.

Luc

> 
> Phil
>> Dim.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Dimitri Pourbaix                         *
>> Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique *      Don't worry, be happy
>> CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO     *         and CARPE DIEM.
>> Universite Libre de Bruxelles            *
>> Boulevard du Triomphe                    *      Tel : +32-2-650.35.71
>>  B-1050 Bruxelles                        *      Fax : +32-2-650.42.26
>> http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix     * mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to