Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Phil, > >>> Right now, I see no option but avoiding the computation of A^tA. It is >>> fair to ask for 2.2. >> >> OK, so you are OK with keeping the fix version for this one at 2.2? > > Yes, I am. I will try to find a fix as soon as possible. If it turns out > to be before the release of 2.1, it will go there. Otherwise, it will be > in 2.2.
Thanks! Any other opinions on the issues that I left marked 2.1? If others are OK with this, I will move 321 and 351-352 to 2.2 and proceed to cut a 2.1 RC. Phil > > Dim. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dimitri Pourbaix * > Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique * Don't worry, be happy > CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO * and CARPE DIEM. > Universite Libre de Bruxelles * > Boulevard du Triomphe * Tel : +32-2-650.35.71 > B-1050 Bruxelles * Fax : +32-2-650.42.26 > http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix * mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
