Dimitri Pourbaix wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What is the present status of MATH-327?  Phil updated on Saturday, I guess,
> to say it will be fixed in 2.2.  However, the present version adresses the
> problem of the number of iterations reaching the maximum.  It also improves
> (but does not completely solve) the situation mentioned by Luc in January
> 28: there is still one spurious non zero singular value
> (3.547702387229884E-7 which I am going to try to kick out) instead of two.
> 
> Dim.

I pushed it to 2.2 because what remained to resolve did not look to
me like a showstopper for 2.1.  I may be missing something, though,
regarding severity.  I am fine getting this into 2.1 if you have a fix.

Phil
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Dimitri Pourbaix                         *
> Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique *      Don't worry, be happy
> CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO     *         and CARPE DIEM.
> Universite Libre de Bruxelles            *
> Boulevard du Triomphe                    *      Tel : +32-2-650.35.71
>  B-1050 Bruxelles                        *      Fax : +32-2-650.42.26
> http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix     * mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to