On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should go into > > the commons project. We already have "math". > > If it doesn't fit in there it might well be better of to get it into labs > > IMO - not commons. > > > > I agree with Torsten on this one. Why doesn't this belong as a part > of math (or maybe a submodule if math wants to have one)? >
Um...maybe for the same kind of reason that [functor] does not belong inside [collections] ;) We don't want to add it to [math] (at least immediately), because it does not really fit with the current focus of [math] and [math] is getting large, and will get larger in 2.0. Nabla also should not depend on [math] either and could be used by itself. As I said, i think it is worth a try and in any case, we should be able to start it in the sandbox. Phil > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
