On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The existing implementation is not yet ready for production. A lot of work > has been done, but there are many missing features. [nabla] can handle > simple functions from end to end (i.e. up to creating an instance of the > differentiated class that is fully functional). Making this code available > in the sandbox would allow to let people look at it, comment on it, > participate if they are interested and make it go live. > > > > What do you think about it ? > > > > > Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should go into > the commons project. We already have "math". > If it doesn't fit in there it might well be better of to get it into labs > IMO - not commons. >
I would say the same could apply to many commons or commons-sandbox components. The question is can we grow a community around this? I think it is worth a try. It does not belong in labs because it is intended as a community project. It could in fact go into [math], but I agree with Luc that it is better to start in the sandbox. If that is not acceptable, I guess we can just work on it in /experimental in [math]. Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
