Should we come up with a general package naming convention for all commons projects and Java 5?
Either: org.apache.commons.io2 org.apache.commons.lang2 org.apache.commons.[project]2 Or: org.apache.commons2.io org.apache.commons2.lang org.apache.commons2.[project] Where the minimum requirement will be Java 5, or perhaps: org.apache.commons5.io org.apache.commons5.lang org.apache.commons5.[project] ? Thank you, Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:47 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5 > > We've discussed moving to a minimum of JDK 1.5 for IO 2.0 previously - > theres also an JIRA report here: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-140 > > From memory the preference was to move to a new package name - how > about "org.apache.commons.io2"? > > Are there any objections to me creating an IO 1.4 branch from the > current trunk and then starting work on IO 2.0 in the trunk. > > Initial plans would be: > > - rename to the new package > - remove deprecated items > - Making appropriate JDK 1.5 changes (generics, using StringBuilder > and new Appendable for Writers etc). > > Niall > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
