We've discussed moving to a minimum of JDK 1.5 for IO 2.0 previously - theres also an JIRA report here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-140
>From memory the preference was to move to a new package name - how about "org.apache.commons.io2"? Are there any objections to me creating an IO 1.4 branch from the current trunk and then starting work on IO 2.0 in the trunk. Initial plans would be: - rename to the new package - remove deprecated items - Making appropriate JDK 1.5 changes (generics, using StringBuilder and new Appendable for Writers etc). Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
