----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24161 -----------------------------------------------------------
I tested this patch locally, VLAN isolated advanced zone with 1 KVM hypervisor. Confirmed this patch resolve bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3682 Thanks! - Toshiaki Hatano On July 23, 2013, 10:02 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 23, 2013, 10:02 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. > > > Repository: cloudstack-git > > > Description > ------- > > Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for > backwards compatibility > > > Diffs > ----- > > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 > > server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java > 6fafa3e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > daan Hoogland > >
