Ack :(
On 9 April 2013 17:38, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > It was on infra-private as that was where I was told to carry the > conversation when I asked in IRC. > I don't think that there is any negotiation to be done, multiple infra > contractors over a period of almost a year have echoed similar > sentiments. > > --David > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > > Strange this was on infra-private, and not infra (which is also > private). I > > only subscribe to the latter. I found your message now. Disappointing. I > > had not realised that this was policy. (I guess undocumented.) Wonder if > > there's any room for negotiation... > > > > > > On 9 April 2013 17:21, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > Do you have a link to the discussion thread, David? I can't find > anything > >> > in my mail. > >> > > >> > >> You'll need to use your member karma, as it's on infra-private: > >> 097901ce30c3$c69ff210$53dfd630$@16degrees.com.au > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > NS > -- NS
