It was on infra-private as that was where I was told to carry the conversation when I asked in IRC. I don't think that there is any negotiation to be done, multiple infra contractors over a period of almost a year have echoed similar sentiments.
--David On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > Strange this was on infra-private, and not infra (which is also private). I > only subscribe to the latter. I found your message now. Disappointing. I > had not realised that this was policy. (I guess undocumented.) Wonder if > there's any room for negotiation... > > > On 9 April 2013 17:21, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Do you have a link to the discussion thread, David? I can't find anything >> > in my mail. >> > >> >> You'll need to use your member karma, as it's on infra-private: >> 097901ce30c3$c69ff210$53dfd630$@16degrees.com.au >> > > > > -- > NS
